The Diaspora's $60 Billion: Why We Must Spend Differently

By Wandji Wilfred · 18 December 2018 · 46 reader comments
Economics & WorkCameroon lens: Social Evolutionreflective

The writer reflects on his brother's regular $50 remittances and pivots to a larger question: Africa receives $60 billion annually from its diaspora—more than the continent gets in foreign aid—yet much is spent on consumption rather than investment. He argues that both diaspora senders and home-based receivers must rethink how this money flows to create lasting economic change.

Our parents and brothers and sisters abroad send us more money than we get in foreign aid!African diaspora remittances vs. total foreign aid to Africa
The piece

TELL YOUR BROTHER ABROAD TO NOT SEND YOU MONEY THIS DECEMBER . My elder brother has a way of messing with me. He works in one of those fancy investment firms on Wall Street. Every 2 months or so, he has these “sale targets” he has to meet, and when he does he gets some kind of a performance bonus.

Every time he gets a bonus like that, he logs on to his Western Union account and sends me $50. Nothing more, nothing less. Just $50. Why? Two reasons.

Number 1

He has this ‘pofpof money’ joke that he does every time he sends me that money. “Take am buy pofpof and beans for sharp. I no wan hear say you no get dough for breakie” the WhatsApp text message would read. I’ve never found the joke funny. But I always send that laughing and crying emoji. You do not look at a gift horse in the mouth, right? Enh-hen!

Number 2

He thinks he is torturing me. You see, there is this Western Union office not too far from my place and there is this nice girl who works there. I chatted her up a long time ago and we developed a close relationship. I cannot get into details at this point. The only thing I can say here is that it is at her office that I cash my transfer payments. Three years ago when my cousin visited Cameroon he met that nice girl and thought his bushfaller swag would win her affection. Little did he know that in my capacity as landlord, I was already receiving her rent.

Anyway, Oga has been sending me $50 thinking that he has been ‘rubbing’ me. I am a Bamileke man. When it comes to money I have no pride. Hahaha. I put the 'rubbing' aside and march proudly to that office like Martin Luther King at Selma. To cut the story short, Aunty and I have been chopping the money. Except when I’m a little broke and the money comes in handy for my utility bills.

But here is the issue. Recently, I read a rather interesting article. It said that my brother’s troublesome $50 was part of the $60 billion dollars that was sent every year to Africa by Africans in the diaspora. Let me loud it: SIXTY billion dollars.

I felt a tremor in my legs when I read that. So I called up a friend who works at the African Development Bank. How much does Africa receive in foreign aid every year, I asked him.

$50 billion, he said. I asked him how much of that money is actually used and how much embezzled? He chuckled for a little while and I imagined him reclining in his office chair and rubbing his stomach when he said: “that, my friend, is the 50 billion dollar question.”

I daresay a quarter of that money is embezzled. In Cameroon, probably half of what enters here goes into private pockets. But let that not distract you from the fact that our parents and brothers and sisters abroad send us more money than we get in foreign aid! As a matter of fact, what they send us is actually 3% of Africa’s $2 trillion dollars GDP. Go figure!

Hey. You know that American guy in the Yahoo News comments section whose comment on any African news article is ‘let’s stop sending them our aid’? Next time, tell him to stick that comment up his butt.

$60 billion is a lot of money. It is 2.5 times the GDP of Cameroon. And if anything it shows two things.

One: That our government which specialises in accusing the diaspora of trying to destabilise the country has its proverbial head up its arse and has been doing nothing short of throwing the baby out with its flawed conception of what it thinks is the bathwater. Actually, it has been trying to drown the baby even before throwing it out.

Two: We need to all sit together and come up with a plan of how to use that money more strategically. I am going to focus more on this part because as far the government and the recent elections have shown we are on our own here, people.

We all (the young and conscious generation) need to start thinking more strategically about putting this financial manna (well, it’s not exactly free money) into a more sustainable use that will make us grow, and perhaps pull up two or three or more people economically along with us.

Ask yourself this question; What is it that we receive money mostly for, from abroad?

Health issues, School fees, Burial, Pocket money ….and….Birthday parties, right?

While the first two above cannot be dealt with otherwise because of poor governance, the last three (plus other reasons you may have thought of), can certainly be managed. For example, is it worth spending 10 million to bury someone, when we can do that for 5 million and use the balance to open up a business which might make more millions? Do I really need to celebrate that birthday party and slay in my Brazilian hair for the gram when I could have used that 500K that my boyfriend/girlfriend/sugar mommy sent me to invest in a business instead?

And to those abroad, you have to start thinking on the long-term impact and the lengths to which your transfer payments can go. I bet you if you sum up what you have sent back home over the last 5 years, you will be shocked at how far that money can go.

Now, I know it’s not easy for you guys overseas and I know also that people have REAL problems here and sometimes people abroad can’t do more than to send those $100 at the times when they send them. I also understand how difficult it is for many families and how those transfer payments are used up. To quote a Pim Boy, I know that “pauvreté don géant sotay pantalon don be na sur-mésure.”

But still, we need to all have some kind of reawakening. That $100 is a drop in a large bucket that could significantly change the face of Africa over the next 10 years if put to good use. Our brothers abroad need to understand how far those dollars can go economically, and we at home need to learn to flip every dollar we receive into three.

For my part, I called my brother yesterday and told him to keep all the $50 he “annoys” me with, in a piggy bank. He can send that to me at the end of the year. I’ll find a business where I can invest 300K in. I am pretty sure I can find one around.

- Wandji Wilfred

$60 billion is a lot of money. It is 2.5 times the GDP of Cameroon.Annual African diaspora remittances put in perspective
Hey. You know that American guy in the Yahoo News comments section whose comment on any African news article is 'let's stop sending them our aid'? Next time, tell him to stick that comment up his butt.Diaspora remittances dwarf foreign aid to Africa
Context

Written in December 2018, this piece speaks to a moment when remittances had become quietly central to African household economies, yet public discourse often treated diaspora support as secondary to aid or state investment. The writer reflects the mindset of a conscious, young Cameroonian navigating both personal humor and macro-economic awareness—caught between the immediate needs of home and the strategic possibilities of collective discipline.

Why it matters

Then, it offered a rare local voice making remittance flows visible and questioning their use—not blaming recipients or senders, but inviting both to think systemically. Now, it reads as a prescient call for financial consciousness that has only grown more urgent as remittances have continued to dwarf aid, and as questions of capital formation and economic sovereignty have sharpened across the continent.

How the audience responded
The audience response was predominantly affirmational, with most comments expressing appreciation and praise for the article's insight on diaspora spending. Recurring themes centered on the shock and moral concern over the $60 billion figure, corruption's role in misusing diaspora remittances, and the need for accountability and sustainable investment—most notably articulated in one substantial comment lamenting how aid enables corrupt leadership while the genuinely needy suffer. Beyond the main governance concern, readers also responded personally, sharing stories of their own business struggles and financial discipline, suggesting the piece resonated as practical motivation rather than sparking structured debate. The engagement was largely celebratory and lightly reflective rather than divisive; the audience confirmed rather than contested the article's premise, and the sparse, informal comments reveal a readership invested in validation and connection with the author rather than critical interrogation of the spending argument itself.
Related in Economics & Work