Driving Change: Youth, Legitimacy, and the Work of Collective Movement

By Tino Foy · 13 February 2020 · 7 reader comments
Governance & Civic LifeCameroon lens: Social Evolutionreflective

The writer argues that sustained human progress typically originates with young people willing to defy convention, and that modern democracy—even its imperfect versions—creates unprecedented tools for collective action. The real work, however, lies in learning to listen across difference and translating online community into offline power.

Most big change and most human progress is driven by young people who don't know any better.On youth as the engine of historical progress
The piece

Most big change and most human progress is driven by young people who don’t know any better. Young people who are just out there trying to do something differently from how it has always been done. Old people on the other hand get old (pun intended), comfortable, cranky, set in their ways and protective of their status.

If you look at the United States for example, the leaders of the civil rights movement were all young people in their twenties. Dr. Martin Luther King was 26 when he started. Bring it home to our very own Thomas Sankara who turned Burkina Faso around in only 4 years.

We live in a democracy or purported democracy if you prefer. Some might argue but the point is, there is a general agreement on the fact that governments have to be given legitimacy by the people. There is more power now than ever in people being able to band together and collectively push for initiatives that are going to make change in their lives - something that was unimaginable for most of human history. Even in autocracies today, there is at least a pretense of democracy.

In most places, if you want to get something done, you have to have majority of people supporting it and a mobilization of resources and the internet has made it easier than ever before for us to mobilize people to support our ideas and initiatives.

For us to be able to come together under a common goal, we must first learn how to listen to each other and learn how we came to be who we are and how we got to thinking the way we do. One thing that is certain is that we cannot count on conventional media to spread the word which makes it YOUR responsibility and the internet is here to make your job easier - I still believe in our case it is highly underused.

Of course once we build those communities online, the next challenge is how to move them offline.

- Tino Foy

Old people on the other hand get old (pun intended), comfortable, cranky, set in their ways and protective of their status.Contrast with youth-driven change
Even in autocracies today, there is at least a pretense of democracy.On the global spread of democratic legitimacy
Context

Written in early 2020, as the internet had become a primary space for political organizing globally, yet many movements still struggled to convert digital momentum into material change. In Cameroon specifically, this reflects a moment of growing digital civic engagement against a backdrop of long-standing governance challenges.

Why it matters

The piece remains vital because it cuts through both tech-utopianism and resignation: it acknowledges real structural power (legitimacy, resources, collective will) without pretending the internet alone transforms it. Its insistence on listening and understanding before organizing reads now as an antidote to algorithm-driven polarization and the fatigue of performative digital activism.

How the audience responded
The comment thread shows affirming sentiment with limited critical depth—most responses express enthusiasm for the article's core ideas about youth-driven change and collective accountability, often through short celebratory remarks or emoji. A single reader raised a substantive counter-argument, warning that appeals to democratic participation can paradoxically entrench autocratic systems, and called for greater accountability alongside internet activism; the author responded briefly and the reader conceded the point, suggesting the critique was engaged rather than combative. The dominant pattern is approval and emotional resonance ('The Key!!!!', 'Change can and will come') rather than sustained debate, indicating the piece resonated with an already-sympathetic audience but did not provoke genuinely contested discussion on its central claims about legitimacy and collective work.
Related in Governance & Civic Life